{"infoWall":{"propertiesGroup":{"properties":[{"label":"Unnamed","showLabel":false,"searchInProperty":true,"styling":{"bold":false,"italic":false}}]},"panels":[{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Argumentative Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fd52b704.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"671884ad-beb8-495a-9be0-f4e1b5576e3b","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Argumentative Review","entries":["

Argumentative Review:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

\n\t
Examines literature selectively to support or refute an argument<\/li>\n\t
The purpose of the argumentative review is to establish and argue a viewpoint that may refute a philosophical problem<\/li>\n\t
The nature of an argumentative review makes it succeptible to bias<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]},{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Integrative Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fd9b94d7.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"a1bc65cf-7484-4071-aba6-2c3ecf248b22","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Integrative Review","entries":["
Integrative Review<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n\t
Reviews, critiques, and synthesizes extant literature on a topic<\/li>\n\t
Presents information in an integrative way that generates new frameworks or perspectives<\/li>\n\t
When done correctly, an integrative review meets the same standards as primary research for clarity, rigour, and replication<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]},{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Historical Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fdecf83d.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"48317250-b85e-497d-903c-224fe648b71a","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Historical Review","entries":["
Hisorical Review<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n\t
Establishes historical context for research over time<\/li>\n\t
Often begins with the first appearance of an issue, concept, theory, or phenomenon in the literature, and tracks its evolution within a discipline over time<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]},{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Methodological Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fe44cbe0.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"09996a05-5ffc-4e70-8c5d-96df40f739bd","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Methodological Review","entries":["
Methodological Review<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n\t
A review that focuses on the method of analysis rather than the subject of analysis<\/li>\n\t
The purpose of the methodological review is to analyze the various ways that a single method is used in the extant literatire<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]},{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Systematic Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fea53560.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"588e9067-95b5-401b-b347-fd3d503fce26","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Systematic Review","entries":["
Systematic Review<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n\t
Overview of existing evidence relating to a clearly formulated research question<\/li>\n\t
Uses standardized methods to identify and critically evaluate relevant research<\/li>\n\t
Collects, reports, and analyzies data outcomes from in-scope studes<\/li>\n\t
Typically focuses on a quantitative, empirical question<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]},{"image":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image","alt":"Theoretical Review","file":{"path":"images\/file-6aad9fee47b5e.png","mime":"image\/png","copyright":{"license":"U"},"width":500,"height":250}},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"727e3aa0-20b7-4a42-aa0e-107049432365","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"panelTitle":"Theoretical Review","entries":["
Theoretical Review<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n\t
Examines the body of theoretical work on an issue, concept, theory, or phenomenon<\/li>\n\t
Establishes what theories exist, how they relate to one another, and what investigation has been done on these theories<\/li>\n\t
This is often used to establish a gap in appropriate theories needed to explain emergin issues or problems<\/li>\n\t
Analysis focuses on theoretical concepts, or entire frameworks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n"]}],"behaviour":{"useFallbackImage":false,"fallbackImage":{"params":{"decorative":false,"contentName":"Image","expandImage":"Expand Image","minimizeImage":"Minimize Image"},"library":"H5P.Image 1.1","subContentId":"4513c19f-0de1-4e17-9a2a-1a46d83639d5","metadata":{"contentType":"Image","license":"U","title":"Untitled Image"}},"imageWidth":150,"imageHeight":150,"alternateBackground":true,"offerFilterField":true,"modeFilterField":"or"},"l10n":{"noEntriesError":"The author did not enter anything.","noMatchesForFilter":"There are not matches for @query.","enterToFilter":"Enter a query to filter the content for relevant entries.","listChanged":"List changed. Showing @visible of @total items."},"header":"Types of Literature Review"}}

Types of Literature Review

Description

Ontario Commons License

Catie Sahadath